Connect with us

Politics

Doctors Rally At SCOTUS Against FDA’s ‘Reckless’ Abandonment Of High-Risk Abortion Drug

Published

on

Doctors, politicians, pro-life leaders, and women’s health advocates rallied outside the United States Supreme Court Tuesday, calling for the overturning of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s reckless abandonment of care standards for women and girls with the deregulation of the chemical abortion drug mifepristone.

Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Erin Hawley, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists CEO Dr. Christina Francis, and Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach spoke outside of the capitol building alongside more than 50 speakers demanding the return of basic safety standards on the high-risk drug as oral arguments opened for U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

‘Recklessly Betraying Women’

A documented high-risk drug resulting in emergent care for 1 in 25 women, mifepristone was first approved for market use in 2000. At that time, a prescriber was required to provide ongoing medical care, an initial in-person visit to screen for complication-inducing conditions, and follow-up care to treat infection, internal bleeding, and other possible side effects. Since then, the FDA has removed those basic safeguards.

The FDA’s action in this case is unprecedented, said ADF senior counsel Julie Marie Blake.

“The FDA’s job is to ensure health and safety, especially when high-risk drugs are involved,” Blake said. “The FDA has failed in that duty; recklessly betraying women who have been taking chemical abortion drugs. We are unaware of any situation in which the FDA has approved any drug with this level of high risk, knowing that 1 in 25 women will

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

Shady Milwaukee Elections Chief Ousted Six Months Before Election, But Will Her Successor Be Worse?

Published

on

Now that Milwaukee’s controversial election chief has been sent packing, Republicans in critical swing-state Wisconsin are wondering whether the fix will be worse than what previously ailed Milwaukee’s election integrity. 

On Monday, Mayor Cavalier Johnson announced Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is out — just six months before November’s presidential election. Woodall, roundly criticized by conservatives for her handling (or mishandling) of the closely contested 2020 presidential election in battleground Wisconsin, will be replaced by her lieutenant, Paulina Gutierrez, according to the far-left Democrat mayor. 

Why? 

Johnson spokesman Jeff Fleming told the Associated Press that Woodall’s ouster had nothing to do with her handling of elections but “other issues internal to the election commission office and to city government that raised concern.” What those “issues” are, Fleming didn’t say. 

In an email response to The Federalist’s questions, Fleming said the mayor, fresh off a reelection victory, is statutorily required to appoint approximately two dozen senior administration officials. 

“In three instances, he named someone who was not an incumbent,” the mayor’s mouthpiece said. 

Fleming told WisPolitics that Woodall had written a job description nearly a year ago for a community outreach position, but she refused the position when it was offered to her last week. 

Woodall was out of the office Tuesday on vacation, according to a commission employee. Gutierrez, who has served as Woodall’s deputy for over a year, was said to be in a meeting Tuesday afternoon and did not return The Federalist’s request for comment. 

‘Checkered History’

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Celebrities’ ‘Misery Chic’ Aesthetic Flows From Their Spiritual Poverty

Published

on

Pop star Billie Eilish has supposedly found her true self, so why does she look so miserable? In a Rolling Stone profile to promote her new album, Eilish confirmed that she is into girls and presented herself as a suffering artist, with accompanying photos showing her looking dirty and unhappy.

This echoed another Rolling Stone profile from earlier this year, in which Kristen Stewart portrayed herself as loudly and angrily gay, proclaiming, “I want to do the gayest f-cking thing you’ve ever seen in your life.” The accompanying photos also showed Stewart looking unhappy and almost aggressively unattractive (which takes some doing for her).

These profiles are reminiscent of other female celebrities such as Ellen Page, whose photoshoots after transitioning to “Elliot” tend to be portraits of unhappy androgyny. Instead of showing their rainbow identities as sources of liberation and joy, these women are marketing themselves as angry and even miserable.

And it is marketing. Interviews and photoshoots don’t just happen. They are carefully arranged to promote celebrities and their projects. Thus, it is odd that these women are presenting themselves as wretched. As Eilish puts it, “My whole life, I’ve never been a happy person, really. … I experience joy and laughter and I can find fun in things, but I’m a depressed person. I’ve suffered with a lot of depression my whole life.”

The most remarkable part of these interviews is the apparent consensus that wretchedness will resonate with fans. Misery may love company, but it rarely advertises

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Celebrities’ ‘Misery Chic’ Aesthetic Flows From Their Spiritually Poverty

Published

on

Pop star Billie Eilish has supposedly found her true self, so why does she look so miserable? In a Rolling Stone profile to promote her new album, Eilish confirmed that she is into girls and presented herself as a suffering artist, with accompanying photos showing her looking dirty and unhappy.

This echoed another Rolling Stone profile from earlier this year, in which Kristen Stewart portrayed herself as loudly and angrily gay, proclaiming, “I want to do the gayest f-cking thing you’ve ever seen in your life.” The accompanying photos also showed Stewart looking unhappy and almost aggressively unattractive (which takes some doing for her).

These profiles are reminiscent of other female celebrities such as Ellen Page, whose photoshoots after transitioning to “Elliot” tend to be portraits of unhappy androgyny. Instead of showing their rainbow identities as sources of liberation and joy, these women are marketing themselves as angry and even miserable.

And it is marketing. Interviews and photoshoots don’t just happen. They are carefully arranged to promote celebrities and their projects. Thus, it is odd that these women are presenting themselves as wretched. As Eilish puts it, “My whole life, I’ve never been a happy person, really. … I experience joy and laughter and I can find fun in things, but I’m a depressed person. I’ve suffered with a lot of depression my whole life.”

The most remarkable part of these interviews is the apparent consensus that wretchedness will resonate with fans. Misery may love company, but it rarely advertises

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending