The Washington Post has long been the mouthpiece of the Democratic National Committee, strutting its phony, self-righteous objectivity around like an exceptionally ugly drag queen. There is no hiding its bias, as there no hiding the dude down deep under the wig, makeup, and stilettos.
Leftist slant is what you come to expect from a publication that has been staffed and led by graduates of the Aaron Sorkin School of Journalism.
But the Post has trended in a much uglier direction in recent years, trading in its claim as defender of the First Amendment for a spot on the cheerleading squad of the speech-silencing movement. Reporters Sarah Ellison, Amy Gardner, and Clara Ence Morse captained the latest pep rally with a hit piece headlined “Elon Musk’s misleading election claims reach millions and alarm election officials.”
‘Uniquely Dangerous’
Beyond the story’s clear and abundant disdain for anything remotely resembling election integrity is the current of the piece: that Musk and his takeover of Twitter — now X — are not only dangerous to elections officials but a threat to democracy. The talking point, for those who have not been following along this long election season, is pulled directly from the Democrat Party playbook.
“Experts say Musk is uniquely dangerous as a purveyor of misinformation because his digital following stretches well beyond the political realm and into the technology and investment sectors, where his business achievements have earned him credibility,” the piece feverishly indicts, as the Post so often does, employing “experts”
