Connect with us

Politics

These Electorally At-Risk Democrats Won’t Commit To Certifying A Trump Victory

Published

on

In the last four years, the left has gone bananas after some Republican officials voted in 2020 against certifying electoral votes from swing states with legally dubious election practices. Wikipedia dedicated an entire page to these Republicans, slandering them as the “Sedition Caucus.”

So what do you call a cohort of vulnerable Democrats in Congress that will not commit to certifying a potential Trump victory? The Federalist inquired with a slew of Democrats listed as some of the most electorally vulnerable by The New York Times whether they would “accept the results of the presidential election if Donald Trump wins?” and whether, if elected, they would “commit to certifying the results of the presidential election if Donald Trump wins?”

Nine vulnerable Democrats responded to The Federalist with some variation of “yes.” Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey, who notably has been touting his support of Trump-era policies in recent campaign ads, told The Federalist that “Members of Congress have a duty to preserve the sanctity of our elections and protect the sacred right to vote. After the states certify their election results, I will vote in favor of certifying those results in Congress to pave the way for the next administration.”

Inquiries to Colorado Rep. Yadira Caraveo, New Mexico Rep. Gabe Vasquez, Washington Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Pennsylvania Rep. Susan Wild went unanswered.

Democrats have insisted for the last four years that all elected officials must promise to certify an election if they don’t want to be “threats to democracy.”

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

Nevada Voters Overwhelmingly Approve Voter ID Amendment, Reject Ranked-Choice Voting

Published

on

Nevada voters are projected to pass a ballot amendment requiring eligible electors to present a form of photo ID when voting and reject a separate initiative seeking to bring ranked-choice voting to the state.

According to The New York Times, preliminary results show the Voter Identification Initiative (Question 7) passing with 73 percent of electors voting “yes” and 27 percent voting “no.” At the time of this article’s publication, approximately 78 percent of votes have been tabulated.

As The Federalist previously reported, Question 7 would require eligible voters to present a valid form of photo ID when voting in person. Those voting by mail would “have to verify their identity using the last four digits of their driver’s license or social security number or the number provided by the county clerk when the voter is registered to vote,” according to Ballotpedia.

In Nevada, constitutional amendment proposals produced by citizen-led signature collection campaigns must be passed by voters in two consecutive general elections to amend the state’s founding document. This year’s election will be the voter ID initiative’s first appearance on the ballot, which means it will need to be approved by voters during the state’s next general election to add it to the Nevada Constitution.

Meanwhile, Nevadans rejected Question 3, which sought to implement a top-five ranked-choice voting (RCV) scheme in the state’s elections.

Often referred to as “rigged-choice voting” by its critics, RCV is an election system in which voters rank candidates of all parties in order of preference. If no candidate

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Media, Call The Race For Trump So We Can All Go To Bed

Published

on

As election night drags on, Donald Trump’s victory is imminent, and Kamala Harris’ path to one has vanished. The New York Times’ election “needle” shows Trump with a greater than 95 percent chance of winning. It all comes down to some of the so-called “blue wall” states Trump carried in 2016 — and he leads in them again. Corporate media are finally starting to acknowledge Trump’s Pennsylvania win, Fox News has put Wisconsin into Trump’s column, and Alaska hasn’t been called yet, meaning the race is over.

So why are so many voters still afraid to go to bed?

Democrat media won’t call the blue wall states of Wisconsin and Michigan, and they won’t call the race. Even though they know Trump will reach more than 270 votes they won’t concede official defeat.

But Americans are old enough to remember the last presidential election, which came down to the exact same states. In 2020, voters went to bed on election night or early Wednesday morning without final results but with Trump leading by comfortable margins in the key battleground states. Corporate networks wouldn’t call the race because of some outstanding ballots, but Republicans rested confidently, and for good reason.

In the middle of the night, however, things changed. In Wisconsin and Michigan, dead-of-night vote dumps went 100 percent for Joe Biden and zero percent — not a single ballot — for Trump, as my colleague John Daniel Davidson wrote at the time. In Michigan, ballot tickers brazenly posted 138,339 magic

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

2024’s Biggest Loser Is The Corporate Media Industrial Complex

Published

on

In the early hours of Wednesday morning, legacy news networks were already sliding toward 2016 levels of melting down about the increasingly definite prospect of a presidential victory by Donald J. Trump. For them, Harris’ stinging defeat is personal — because it’s just as much a defeat for them as it is for her.

The corporate media industrial complex has spent Donald Trump’s entire political career trying to destroy him. Hand-in-hand with triple-letter government agencies and Democrats, they ran a hoax painting Trump as a Russian stooge based on ridiculous rumors commissioned by his opponent’s campaign in 2016. They continued to spread the lie for the duration of his presidency, awarding each other Pulitzers for it. And they’ve only ramped up their efforts since then.

The problem they’re reckoning with tonight is this: those efforts didn’t work. They’re no longer able to control Americans by controlling their information intake, because their credibility is farther deep-sixed than the Clinton family’s enemies list.

A TV executive anonymously fretted last week that “If half the country has decided that Trump is qualified to be president, that means they’re not reading any of this media, and we’ve lost this audience completely. A Trump victory means mainstream media is dead in its current form.”

Even before the election results were in, that was true of the corporate press. Jeff Bezos knew it when he reportedly ordered The Washington Post to withhold an endorsement of Harris. But now, they can’t avoid it.

Since the last

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending