Connect with us

Politics

Supreme Court Blocks Democrats’ Bid To Keep Noncitizens On Virginia’s Voter Rolls

Published

on

On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down an attempt by the Biden-Harris Justice Department to keep noncitizens on Virginia’s voter rolls.

In a one-page order, the nation’s highest court granted an emergency request by the commonwealth to place a stay on a lower court ruling that prohibited state election officials from removing roughly 1,600 “self-identified” noncitizens from Virginia’s voter registration lists. Decided by a Biden-appointed judge, the district court ruling was upheld by a three-judge panel of Democrat appointees on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals on Sunday.

The Supreme Court’s granting of Virginia’s request seemingly fell along partisan lines, with all three Democrat justices voting to “deny the application.”

The dispute started in August, when Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order directing Virginia agencies to undertake voter list maintenance and other election security procedures ahead of the November election. In the order, the governor revealed the state had removed 6,303 noncitizens from the commonwealth’s voter rolls from January 2022 to July 2024.

The Biden-Harris DOJ filed a lawsuit against the state earlier this month, alleging that the Youngkin administration’s removal of noncitizens and other ineligible individuals from Virginia’s voter rolls this close to the general election violated federal law.

Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares appealed to the Supreme Court on Sunday, shortly after the 4th Circuit panel issued its decision. In his emergency application for stay, the commonwealth’s chief law enforcement officer argued that the Biden-appointed district court judge based her injunction on a provision within federal statute that

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

America Isn’t Free As Long As Its Press Is Subservient To The Democrat Party

Published

on

For most honest Americans, truth and lie are fairly easy to differentiate. But to our nation’s propaganda media, the terms are completely subjective.

Case in point: the media’s unhinged response to Donald Trump’s Thursday critique of Liz Cheney’s obsession with military adventurism. While speaking with Tucker Carlson in Arizona, the former president rebuked Cheney for her foreign policy and the threat it poses to the U.S. and its service members.

“[Liz Cheney] always wanted to go to war with people. I didn’t want to go to war. She wanted to stay in Syria; I took them out. She wanted to stay in Iraq; I took them out. I mean, if it were up to her, we’d be in 50 different countries,” Trump said. “[N]umber one, it’s really dangerous; number two, a lot of people get killed; and number three …, it’s very, very expensive. That’s why we owe $36 trillion.”

Later in the conversation, Trump followed up with comments that have since been hijacked by corporate media: “[Cheney is] a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle, standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it … when the guns are trained on her face. You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Gee, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy,’” he said.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand Trump’s commentary. He was clearly saying that neocons

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Media Run Blatant Election Interference With Propaganda About Trump ‘Threatening’ Liz Cheney

Published

on

If you woke up Friday morning and glanced at the headlines of any major media outlet, you would think former President Donald Trump had threatened former Rep. Liz Cheney with execution by firing squad. Four days before the election, you would think Trump had just said, on a stage in Arizona with Tucker Carlson, that if elected he would have Cheney killed.

He didn’t say that of course. It was and is a massive media and Harris campaign psy-op designed to interfere in the election, suppress and depress GOP voters, and set the stage for denying Trump the presidency if he wins at the ballot box on Tuesday.

Here’s a sampling of what the press said. “Trump threatens ex-Rep. Liz Cheney with execution by firing squad,” blared a headline from New York Daily News. The New York Times was only slightly more subtle in its headline, “Trump Assails Liz Cheney and Imagines Guns ‘Shooting at Her.’” Not to be outdone, The Washington Post went with “Trump embraces violent rhetoric, suggests Liz Cheney should have guns ‘trained on her face,’” while CNN declared, “Trump says ‘war hawk’ Liz Cheney should be fired upon in escalation of violent rhetoric against his opponents.”

None of that is true. Anyone who watched the full clip of Trump’s comments could see for himself that Trump was talking about how Cheney is a neocon war hawk who doesn’t have the guts to face the consequences of her own policies. He said, “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle,

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

After RNC Lawsuit Extended ‘On-Demand’ Mail-In Voting, Bucks County Pennsylvanians Still Faced Massive Lines

Published

on

People stood in line for hours on Friday at Bucks County, Pennsylvania, election offices waiting for their chance to participate in the election. Some were outraged that the line was so slow and the county did not have more election workers on hand.

“They opened at 8:00,” Pat Poprik, chair of the Bucks County Republican Committee told The Federalist. “People were there at 8:30 and by 12:30 they had not voted. … The average wait was like four or five hours.”

Some social media posts claimed the long lines were purposeful and were evidence of the county attempting to suppress voters, but Poprik does not think so.

“I don’t think it’s voter suppression. I think it was inconvenient. They were not disenfranchised. They were still able to vote, albeit inconvenient and a long time, but they weren’t not allowed. It wasn’t like Tuesday when they put that placard down and said you can’t vote. That was disenfranchisement, and that’s what the judge addressed, and rightly so.”

It’s after 7 p.m. & voters are STILL waiting for their ballots.

Was this intentional in a county that we recently flipped from 🔵🔜🔴?

📍Levittown, PA
📍Bucks County pic.twitter.com/LV2sW8bCB6

— ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) November 1, 2024

The Republican National Committee and the Trump campaign went to the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas this week, complaining the county’s action of turning voters away before the 5:00 p.m. deadline on Tuesday violated the election code.

The deadline to apply for a mail-in ballot in Pennsylvania was

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending