Connect with us

Politics

SCOTUS: New York Gun Grabbers Trampled First Amendment To Stifle National Rifle Association

Published

on

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled on Thursday that state officials in New York violated the National Rifle Association’s First Amendment rights when they waged a coercion campaign against companies they regulated to “punish or suppress the NRA’s gun-promotion advocacy.”

New York Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo led the charge against the NRA by opening a 2017 investigation into affinity insurance program Carry Guard. She determined Carry Guard violated New York laws, which prompted the organization’s insurance broker to suspend its partnership. Encouraged by this outcome, Vullo extended “her investigation into the NRA’s other affinity insurance programs.”

Spurred on by the Parkland, Florida, shooting in February 2018, Vullo called a meeting with insurance executives at Lloyd’s. In that discussion, she used her personal “views on gun control and [her] desire to leverage [her] powers to combat the availability of firearms.” She told the company that its partnership with the NRA appeared to violate “an array of technical regulatory infractions” that could only be remedied by refusing to grant coverage to Second Amendment organizations like the NRA.

Shortly after that in April, Vullo penned a letter to every insurance and financial entity regulated by her office deeming the “tragic devastation caused by gun violence” a “public safety and health issue” and not so subtly threatening “reputational risks” “may arise” for companies that work with NRA. Then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued a same-day press release affirming Vullo’s stance and demanding companies sever ties with the NRA.

Vullo and Cuomo’s combined bullying

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

‘We Are Men And Women’: Texas Supreme Court Upholds State Protections Against Child Transing

Published

on

Image CreditFDRLST/Canva

The Texas Supreme Court ruled on Friday to uphold a Lone Star State law that effectively bans gender experimentation on children.

In an 8-1 decision published on Friday, the highest court in the state confirmed the legislature’s May 2023 law prohibiting health care professionals from castrating and mutilating minors does not violate the state constitution, as a trial court had previously concluded.

In fact, Justice Rebeca Aizpuru Huddle, joined by Chief Justice Nathan Hecht, Justice Jeff Boyd, Justice John Phillip Devine, Justice Jimmy Blacklock, Justice Brett Busby, Justice Jane Bland, and Justice Evan Young, affirmed in her majority opinion that the state has a vested interest in protecting children.

“Indeed, we have never held that a fit parent’s interest in caring for her child free from government interference, though weighty, triggers heightened scrutiny of every statute that restricts any asserted right connected to that interest,” Huddle wrote.

Huddle confirmed that the court believes kids, including those struggling with their sex, “deserve the most appropriate treatment together with support, love, and empathy.” She stopped short, however of pinpointing “the most appropriate treatment for a child suffering from gender dysphoria.”

Justice Blacklock, joined by Justice Devine, was far more hard-hitting about the parents and practitioners prescribing irreversible damage to kids as a solution in his concurring opinion.

“We are men and women, irreducibly and inescapably, no matter how we feel. Proceeding from these moral and philosophical premises, the Traditional Vision naturally holds that medicinal or

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Tractor Supply’s DEI Reversal Shows The Power Of Citizen Activism

Published

on

Tractor Supply announced Thursday it is no longer implementing neo-Marxist initiatives throughout the company, marking a rare win for conservatives seeking to restore sanity to American institutions.

“We work hard to live up to our Mission and Values every day and represent the values of the communities and customers we serve,” a company press release reads. “We have heard from customers that we have disappointed them. We have taken this feedback to heart. Going forward, we will ensure our activities and giving tie directly to our business.”

The announcement came after conservative filmmaker and former congressional candidate Robby Starbuck unearthed the company’s infatuation with so-called “diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI),” a poisonous left-wing framework that dismisses merit and instead discriminates based on characteristics such as skin color and sex. Individuals who qualify for a certain position on merit but don’t meet the discriminating entity’s goal of being more “diverse” are often passed over in favor of those who meet institutionally preferred identitarian standards.

Over the course of several weeks, Starbuck revealed how Tractor Supply implemented these left-wing ideologies throughout its company and financially supported related causes. Some of the policies adopted by the outdoor retail giant included publishing charts analyzing how many racial minorities it hired, flying LGBT flags at distribution centers, and partaking in LGBT “pride” events.

Watch part of Starbuck’s investigative series below.

It’s time to expose Tractor Supply.

It’s one of the most beloved brands in 🇺🇸 by conservatives but what do they REALLY

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Media Finally Admit Biden Poses Grave Danger To Country After Years Of Defensive Coverage

Published

on

Last week, the White House and its left-wing media apparatus adopted a new phrase, “cheap fakes,” to try and deflect from the decrepit president, Joe Biden. But there was nothing “fake” about Biden’s Thursday debate performance, which is why the left is now openly — and rightfully — questioning Biden’s fitness for office.

But make no mistake, the media’s deliberate gaslighting of the American public for years about Biden’s health and mental agility has put us in grave danger, and calls for Biden to be replaced are a tacit admission of that.

Axios’ Alex Thompson said on CNN in the wake of the debate that the White House had gaslit and lied not only to the American people about Biden’s age, but also to reporters.

While it may be true that the White House gaslit the public, the media deserves to shoulder just as much blame as the White House, if not more. It doesn’t take an expert to see Biden falling up the stairs, over sandbags, and off his bike to question his physical limitations. It certainly doesn’t take an expert to hear Biden’s incoherent gaffes and mumbling to question his mental acuity.

If an 81-year-old showed up for a job interview acting the way Biden does, he’d be sat in a waiting room until police could determine which nursing home he escaped from. So, an actually functioning press would have relentlessly covered this clear danger to our national security, but instead they published whatever talking points the

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending