Connect with us

Politics

If Masculinity Is Bad, Why Didn’t Tim Walz Admit He Ran From War And Couldn’t Father A Child?

Published

on

By now it has become clear that the Democrats’ presidential ticket has simply changed out one old lying white guy for another. The latest revelation is that, despite years of claims otherwise, Tim Walz and his wife, Gwen, didn’t actually conceive their daughter, Hope, with the medically invasive and potentially morally fraught in vitro fertilization (IVF) but instead with the less invasive and less controversial intrauterine insemination (IUI). 

The Harris campaign and their surrogates in media have once again clamored to excuse these latest misrepresentations about his life as a minor mix-up with Walz again “misspeaking.” But why did he choose to describe his family’s fertility journey as involving IVF, a procedure that generally points to female infertility, rather than IUI, which tends to highlight male infertility issues? 

By claiming that his family underwent IVF, he sidestepped any potential stigma associated with male infertility. Admitting to IUI, which is often necessitated by issues with male sperm motility, might have been an admission that he did not meet the traditional expectations of virility. In a society that continues to measure a man’s worth by his ability to sire children naturally, such an admission could have been seen as too emasculating — even for the Democrat Party.

It’s similar to his years-long façade about serving in combat and retiring as a command sergeant major, when his final rank was actually the less glamorous rank of “master sergeant.” With this lie, he sought to bolster his image as a strong and courageous leader,

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

Kirby’s Reply-All Rebuff Of Veterans Confirms The Biden Administration’s Disdain For Our Military

Published

on

In the Biden Administration’s latest “suckers and losers” scandal, White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby waved off a group of veterans critical of the Democrat regime’s botched Afghanistan withdrawal as being “all of one stripe.”

The rebuff came on Wednesday after Fox News Digital asked Kirby to weigh in on quotes from four veterans, including Rep. Cory Mills, R-Fla., who were unsatisfied with the White House official’s reaction to a new House GOP report highlighting “the chaos and instability” that took 13 U.S. service members’ lives in 2021.

During a White House press briefing on Monday, Kirby claimed that the 350-page report was “one-sided,” “partisan,” and wrongfully accused the Biden administration of “deception, lying, or lack of transparency.”

In an email chain intended for White House staffers on the National Security Council, Kirby remarked that there was “Obviously no use in responding” to the comment request because it came from “A ‘handful’ of vets indeed and all of one stripe.” Kirby did not notice at the time that his reply copied Fox News Digital.

“Clearly, I didn’t realize you were on the chain,” Kirby later clarified.

In an official statement, Kirby admitted to the accidental reply-all but claimed to “stand by my comments in the briefing room.”

Democrats like Kirby often accuse former President Donald Trump of insulting the U.S. military. Since 2020 they and corporate media have specifically capitalized on a fake news report that falsely accused Trump of insulting the deceased World War I soldiers in

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

If Zuckerberg Truly Regrets His 2020 Censorship, Facebook Should Stop Smothering Free Speech

Published

on

Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg now admits in writing that he was manipulated by the Biden administration into suppressing free speech on Meta platforms. His actions obstructed vital information on effective Covid protocols and bolstered the lie that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. This did enormous damage to our health and polity.

But Facebook’s censorship brought harm to innocent children too. I’m a longtime teacher, and for decades I’ve personally witnessed dangerous corruption in America’s schools. I dared to warn families, so I was silenced by Zuckerberg’s “shadow-banning,” thanks to algorithms imposed by censors (“fact-checkers”) at Meta.

Meta’s banning (as well as Twitter’s) began the very same night of my 2020 speech at the Republican National Convention. My pages changed from active with hundreds of likes and shares to zero likes and shares. And I went from rapid, daily follower increases to a complete halt in growth. Hundreds of my followers have reached out to me since the banning began to tell me that they no longer see my posts in their newsfeeds. Instagram’s (Meta’s) analytics show that an average of only 25 percent of my followers are seeing my content. That’s how shadow-banning works. I’m allowed to post, but my message is squelched.

Though I’m a volunteer in this battle for the kids, I had to hire social media experts to help me get my message to the public. They’ve reignited my social media presence — predominantly on Meta’s Instagram — with a reel-heavy strategy. Our ratios are the highest they’ve ever been — with the exception

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Latest Covid Shots Released Without Safety Data Under 4.5-Year-Old ‘Emergency’

Published

on

The Food and Drug Administration last month announced the availability of new Covid-19 vaccines directed to the latest variants in circulation but failed to disclose that the vaccines have not been established as safe and effective. Given the ongoing controversies about prior Covid mRNA vaccines during the pandemic, the FDA should do the work to assure the American people that the well-established standards for vaccine approval are applied to these novel mRNA technologies.

The FDA could release the latest Covid shots without proving safety and efficacy because they remain under the “emergency use authorization” (EUA) category. According to the FDA, “The ‘may be effective’ standard for EUAs provides for a lower level of evidence than the ‘effectiveness’ standard that FDA uses for product approvals.” The FDA has this authority only because the secretary of health and human services determined on Feb. 4, 2020, that there was a public health emergency that involved the virus that causes Covid-19, and this determination has remained in place over four years later.

In 2020, the U.S. was in a Covid public health emergency, but are we still in September 2024? 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that as of Aug. 31, only 2.3 percent of emergency room visits were for Covid. The rate of hospitalization for Covid is only 0.005 percent and is dropping. From a peak death rate in 2021 of 26,028 Americans per week, there are only 663 “deaths involving COVID-19” in the latest weekly CDC data. 

The reduced death rate

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending