The stunning political win of the Farmer-Citizen Movement in recent provincial elections in the Netherlands was a populist backlash against ambitious environmental initiatives to eliminate thousands of law-abiding, multi-generational farmers to reduce nitrogen and other alleged pollutants. A similar clamor of farmers in Belgium recently blocked the streets of Brussels with 2,700 tractors. Environmental policies that measure nitrogen and carbon but ignore future food supplies are reckless.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has heightened its focus on food production in recent years, claiming it wishes to “shape the future of food” and that “the global food crisis must be solved alongside the climate crisis.” Moneyed interests have long jockeyed for greater world power and control, whether through organizations such as the WEF or corporate conglomerates seeking to dominate specific markets. The list of multinational corporations signed on with the WEF is impressive and includes the major food-producing companies of the world. There’s a lot of profit in food, and even more power. Eclipsing elected governments to save humanity from climate change meshes comfortably with globalist intentions to save the world from hunger — and together, they promise complete domination.
In the 1970s, Henry Kissinger reportedly advocated making the provision of food relief conditional on nations’ implementation of birth-control policies. If Kissinger, now a sitting member of the WEF, was willing to blackmail whole societies with food five decades ago, he likely hasn’t changed his Machiavellian tune. There’s little difference between coercion to use birth control (to save the planet from
