Connect with us

Politics

Can The 25th Amendment Withstand A Weaponized Justice System?

Published

on

Sometimes removing a controversial issue from its current context allows viewers to see things from a better, and more detached, historical perspective. Two assassination attempts against Donald Trump, and myriad investigations into his conduct, have raised issues about lawfare and presidential succession — but most Americans’ views on the same have much to do with their views about Trump.

For this reason, a new documentary on the vice presidency gives a fresh perspective on the complications of American governance. Examination of prior events surrounding presidential succession — ones in the not-too-distant past — provides for speculation on how bad behavior by elected officials could lead to prolonged “lawfare” and a constitutional crisis.

Constitutional Amendments

The documentary, which premiered just before the vice presidential debate earlier this month, begins innocently enough. It examines the paucity of time the Constitution’s framers spent pondering the vice president’s role at the Philadelphia Convention of 1787, how the controversial election of 1800 led to the 12th Amendment, which allowed for the election of a president and vice president on a party ticket, and the legacy John Tyler established when he assumed the presidency from William Henry Harrison upon Harrison’s death in 1841, creating a succession precedent that the country would need to rely on far too frequently.

As the United States took a more prominent role on the world stage in the middle of the 20th century, issues of presidential succession likewise took center stage. Dwight Eisenhower’s lengthy convalescence after a series of health scares

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

When Did Google Search Become Totally Useless?

Published

on

When Google launched in the late 1990s, it quickly overtook the market for search engines. Its proprietary method of indexing led users to results they were actually looking for rather than producing the hodgepodge of results offered by other search engines of the time. Within just a few years, it was dominating the market. Today, it is a money-printing machine.

It’s also increasingly horrible at the core mission that produced such success. The company’s leadership may have realized early on that to dominate they needed to maximize the marketing angle of search, but over time that side of the business — the one that produces revenue — swallowed the informative results that drove the search engine’s success.

Now, Google’s true product, its users, are drowning in a sea of partisan slop and sponsored content rather than getting the results we’re looking for when we take to the World Wide Web. By doing so, Google is making it pointless for us to continue to allow ourselves to be the product.

Let’s say you have an artistic daughter who wants some oil paints for Christmas, but you’re unsure about which brand to buy or even what the definition of oil paint is. You head over to Google and type in “oil paint.” Is your first result a definition or even the Wikipedia page? Nope, it’s ads. You have to scroll to get to Wikipedia.

Similarly, you might find yourself hungry while on the road, so someone in the car

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Asking Questions About Election Integrity Doesn’t Make Someone An ‘Election Denier’

Published

on

If Americans have questions and concerns about how our elections are administered and how ballots are tabulated, does that make them “election deniers,” conspiracy theorists, threats to democracy?

The Wall Street Journal seems to think so. In a long news report published over the weekend headlined, “‘It Feels Very Dystopian.’ Republican County Officials Brace for Election Deniers—Again,” the Journal repeatedly characterized those who think the 2020 election was stolen, rigged, or less-than-secure as “election deniers,” and stopped just short of calling them domestic terrorists. 

The piece is framed as a disturbing look at the growing threats facing local election officials from “election deniers” — an asinine epithet — as we approach November 5: “Four years of baseless allegations of election fraud have created an atmosphere of fear and intimidation among election officials from Atlanta to rural Washington state, transforming the way workers in many parts of the country are approaching the most fundamental of civic duties.”

Election officials, workers, and even volunteers have been forced to take extraordinary measures to protect themselves, we’re told. Active shooter drills, barricading exercises, trauma kits, bulletproof glass, and bulletproof vests have all become commonplace in election offices across the country. Scary stuff.

And it’s all Trump’s fault, apparently. After a series of legal challenges to the 2020 results  were dismissed, Trump “has continued to assert the election was rigged,” the article reads, eliding the important difference between stealing and rigging an election.

The former would mean falsely cast or illegally changed ballots, which is difficult to prove

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump, Not Kamala Harris, Is Running A Campaign Full Of Joy

Published

on

I’ve seen some amazing crowds in my life. In 1985, my mom scored me and a couple of friends tickets (and backstage passes) to see Prince in Worcester, Massachusetts, on the Purple Rain tour. I still remember standing in the crowd with my lace fingerless gloves on, thinking my mom was the absolute coolest for getting us into the arena. As Prince took the stage and spoke the intro to “Let’s Go Crazy” (“Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today to get through this thing called life …”), thousands of people just like me went nuts. The rafters shook from the weight of all the jumping and shuffling feet.

Almost 40 years later, I stood in the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, waiting for President Trump to take the stage. Less than 48 hours earlier, he’d been shot in the ear by a crazed would-be assassin in Butler, Pennsylvania, the sad result of many months of dangerous rhetoric by Democrats and their allies in the corporate media. But he’d survived, pumping his fist to the crowd at the Secret Service dragged him offstage, yelling “Fight! Fight! Fight!” to his supporters. Finally, he took the stage. Compared to the sound I heard that evening, the roar of all those teenage Prince fans was nothing.

As we head into the final weeks of the presidential campaign, the corporate press continues to tell us that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are running a campaign of “joy.” They tell us that the Democrats are

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending