Connect with us

Politics

Voters Across The Country Take A Sledgehammer To Ranked-Choice Voting Initiatives

Published

on

With 2024 election results tabulated in most states, a clear pattern has emerged. That is, voters have no interest in allowing ranked-choice voting (RCV) to corrupt their elections.

In numerous states across the country, ballot initiatives seeking to implement RCV in elections were overwhelmingly defeated by electors. Under RCV, voters rank candidates of all parties in order of preference. If no candidate receives more than 50 percent of first-choice votes in the first round of voting, the last-place finisher is eliminated, and his votes are reallocated to his voters’ second-choice candidate.

This process continues until one candidate receives a majority of votes.

RCV has produced lopsided election results and races with high rates of discarded ballots. It’s often been pushed by Democrats as a way of winning traditionally Republican seats, as evidenced in Alaska and Maine.

In Nevada, early results show more than half of the state’s 2024 electors voting “no” against a constitutional amendment proposal that sought to implement a top-five RCV system. Having been approved by Silver State voters in the last general election, the initiative required passage on Tuesday to be ratified as part of the Nevada Constitution.

As a result of its failure to secure support from a majority of voters, the amendment will not be added to the state’s founding document.

In Arizona, preliminary results indicate voters have defeated Proposition 140. That constitutional amendment proposal sought to institute an open primary system in which candidates of all parties run in the same primary. It

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

Elon Musk Is The Unsung Hero Of The 2024 Election

Published

on

It seemed unfathomable four years ago that the guy known for making electric cars and space tech would go on to play an instrumental role in shaping the discourse among the American electorate. Then again, nothing about U.S. politics is “normal” these days.

Amid the celebration of Donald Trump’s and Republicans’ election victories Tuesday night stands Elon Musk and his historic decision to purchase Twitter two years ago. What may have appeared as a trivial acquisition to some has been one of the most transformative decisions impacting freedom of speech in modern U.S. history.

Prior to Musk’s purchase, Twitter was just another weapon in the censorship industrial complex’s arsenal. The Big Tech company regularly colluded with the federal government to censor Americans whose posts — no matter how factually accurate — ran afoul of what regime bureaucrats found to be inconvenient to the dishonest narratives they pushed at any given time.

This unholy alliance knew no bounds, even going as far as to interfere in the 2020 election to the benefit of Joe Biden. When the New York Post dropped its infamous Hunter Biden laptop story documenting the Biden family’s foreign business dealings days before the 2020 contest, Twitter went into full-on censorship mode.

As documented in the Twitter Files, users were not permitted to share the story, even via direct message. The Big Tech company further removed links and posted warnings that the article may be “unsafe.”

It was only years later that Americans learned through testimony

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Here Are The Corporate Media Meltdowns You’ve Been Waiting For

Published

on

Democrats and the media aren’t taking the election results well after former President Donald Trump made a triumphant White House comeback complemented by a new GOP majority in the Senate.

Leftist supporters of Vice President Kamala Harris posted videos of themselves crying about the results on the internet, while the talking heads on CNN and MSNBC reflexively blamed racism for the Democrats’ historic loss.

“I am profoundly disturbed,” said The View’s Sunny Hostin on Wednesday, “that the 14th Amendment of the Constitution did not prevent someone who participated in an insurrection from becoming president of the United States.”

“I’m surprised at the result, but I’m not surprised,” Hostin added. “As a woman of color, I was so hopeful that a mixed-race woman married to a Jewish guy could be elected president of this country, and I think that it had nothing to do with policy. I think this was a referendum of cultural resentment in this country.”

On election night, CNN’s Van Jones held back tears when he similarly characterized Harris’ loss as a rejection of the left’s victimized form of identity politics.

“It’s not the elites that [are] going to pay the price,” Jones said. “It’s people who woke up this morning with a dream and are going to bed with, with a nightmare.”

Left-wing podcast host Cenk Uygur screamed on air as Trump neared the 270 electoral votes needed to clinch the Oval Office.

“These Democratic leaders are the most useless people on

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Biden Still Would’ve Lost To Trump, But It Would Have Been Less Embarrassing For Democrats

Published

on

Former President Donald Trump mopped the floor with Kamala Harris in a blowout comeback victory Tuesday night. As of the time of this report, Trump has a sizable lead in the popular vote and is poised to clinch the remaining battleground states.

Trump’s victory should be attributed to his strong policy, likability, election integrity team, and get-out-the-vote efforts. He would almost certainly have trounced Harris’ boss Joe Biden too, as Federalist CEO and Cofounder Sean Davis pointed out. But Trump’s historic win makes the effort to replace Joe Biden in a bloodless coup and install his unpopular vice president against the will of Democrat primary voters look a lot more ridiculous. It’s hard to imagine Biden — or a cardboard cutout for that matter — getting blown out of the water as majorly as Harris was.

“Biden still would’ve lost to Trump, but he would’ve done better than Harris and likely saved a handful of Senate seats for Democrats in the process,” Davis said on X. “Maybe even the House.”

Joe Biden still would’ve lost to Trump, but he would’ve done better than Harris and likely saved a handful of Senate seats for Democrats in the process. Maybe even the House.

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 6, 2024

CNN indicated early Wednesday morning that Harris failed to outperform Biden by 3 percent or more in any state.

Despite Biden’s age and visible cognitive decline, he maintained a strong connection to his Democratic base, especially minority voters and union workers

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending