Connect with us

Politics

After Voter Finds Fraudulent Ballot Cast In His Name, New York Tells Him It Will Count Anyway

Published

on

DUTCHESS COUNTY, New York — “I’m sorry sir, but you already voted.”

“No I didn’t,” 55-year-old Mike Miner told a Wappingers Falls election worker on Sunday — yet that’s not what election records showed.

Miner told The Federalist that he decided to vote early, just one day after early voting began on Saturday.

“I went up to the table and was told I already voted,” Miner said. “I ask, ‘Where did I vote?’ Because, of course, this is very surprising to me. And they told me I voted in the town of Fishkill [which is located next to Wappingers], 22 minutes after early voting began on Saturday.”

Miner was given an affidavit ballot, which is a provisional ballot that is secured inside an affidavit envelope. A bipartisan team at the Dutchess County Board of Elections investigated the situation and determined that since the signature provided Saturday did not match Miner’s actual signature, Miner’s affidavit ballot will count — but so will the fraudulent vote cast Saturday in Miner’s name. That’s because once a ballot is cast, the vote itself becomes anonymous, making it impossible to identify the fraudulent vote and remove it from the bunch.

“This election is so important to me, and for somebody to vote in my name — I feel so violated,” Miner said.

Erik Haight, the Republican election commissioner on the Dutchess County Board of Elections, told The Federalist that he takes the incident extremely seriously and will be working with local law

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

America Isn’t Free As Long As Its Press Is Subservient To The Democrat Party

Published

on

For most honest Americans, truth and lie are fairly easy to differentiate. But to our nation’s propaganda media, the terms are completely subjective.

Case in point: the media’s unhinged response to Donald Trump’s Thursday critique of Liz Cheney’s obsession with military adventurism. While speaking with Tucker Carlson in Arizona, the former president rebuked Cheney for her foreign policy and the threat it poses to the U.S. and its service members.

“[Liz Cheney] always wanted to go to war with people. I didn’t want to go to war. She wanted to stay in Syria; I took them out. She wanted to stay in Iraq; I took them out. I mean, if it were up to her, we’d be in 50 different countries,” Trump said. “[N]umber one, it’s really dangerous; number two, a lot of people get killed; and number three …, it’s very, very expensive. That’s why we owe $36 trillion.”

Later in the conversation, Trump followed up with comments that have since been hijacked by corporate media: “[Cheney is] a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle, standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it … when the guns are trained on her face. You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Gee, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy,’” he said.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand Trump’s commentary. He was clearly saying that neocons

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Media Run Blatant Election Interference With Propaganda About Trump ‘Threatening’ Liz Cheney

Published

on

If you woke up Friday morning and glanced at the headlines of any major media outlet, you would think former President Donald Trump had threatened former Rep. Liz Cheney with execution by firing squad. Four days before the election, you would think Trump had just said, on a stage in Arizona with Tucker Carlson, that if elected he would have Cheney killed.

He didn’t say that of course. It was and is a massive media and Harris campaign psy-op designed to interfere in the election, suppress and depress GOP voters, and set the stage for denying Trump the presidency if he wins at the ballot box on Tuesday.

Here’s a sampling of what the press said. “Trump threatens ex-Rep. Liz Cheney with execution by firing squad,” blared a headline from New York Daily News. The New York Times was only slightly more subtle in its headline, “Trump Assails Liz Cheney and Imagines Guns ‘Shooting at Her.’” Not to be outdone, The Washington Post went with “Trump embraces violent rhetoric, suggests Liz Cheney should have guns ‘trained on her face,’” while CNN declared, “Trump says ‘war hawk’ Liz Cheney should be fired upon in escalation of violent rhetoric against his opponents.”

None of that is true. Anyone who watched the full clip of Trump’s comments could see for himself that Trump was talking about how Cheney is a neocon war hawk who doesn’t have the guts to face the consequences of her own policies. He said, “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle,

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

After RNC Lawsuit Extended ‘On-Demand’ Mail-In Voting, Bucks County Pennsylvanians Still Faced Massive Lines

Published

on

People stood in line for hours on Friday at Bucks County, Pennsylvania, election offices waiting for their chance to participate in the election. Some were outraged that the line was so slow and the county did not have more election workers on hand.

“They opened at 8:00,” Pat Poprik, chair of the Bucks County Republican Committee told The Federalist. “People were there at 8:30 and by 12:30 they had not voted. … The average wait was like four or five hours.”

Some social media posts claimed the long lines were purposeful and were evidence of the county attempting to suppress voters, but Poprik does not think so.

“I don’t think it’s voter suppression. I think it was inconvenient. They were not disenfranchised. They were still able to vote, albeit inconvenient and a long time, but they weren’t not allowed. It wasn’t like Tuesday when they put that placard down and said you can’t vote. That was disenfranchisement, and that’s what the judge addressed, and rightly so.”

It’s after 7 p.m. & voters are STILL waiting for their ballots.

Was this intentional in a county that we recently flipped from 🔵🔜🔴?

📍Levittown, PA
📍Bucks County pic.twitter.com/LV2sW8bCB6

— ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) November 1, 2024

The Republican National Committee and the Trump campaign went to the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas this week, complaining the county’s action of turning voters away before the 5:00 p.m. deadline on Tuesday violated the election code.

The deadline to apply for a mail-in ballot in Pennsylvania was

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending