Connect with us

Politics

Grassroots Group Vows To Refile Lawsuits Aiming To Keep Nevada’s Voter Rolls Clean

Published

on

An election integrity group that withdrew its lawsuits seeking to remove allegedly ineligible registrants from Nevada’s voter rolls is planning to re-issue its challenges following Election Day, The Federalist has learned.

“We’re going to come back and refile after November 5th,” Citizen Outreach Foundation (COF) President Chuck Muth told The Federalist.

The entire saga began earlier this year when the COF via its Pigpen Project began filing citizen-led challenges to potentially ineligible electors on the state voter rolls. Using data from government agencies and various sections under state statute, the group worked with local election officials to ensure its affidavits were filed in accordance with state law.

After the CFO spent months working through this process and navigating roadblocks erected by Democrat Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar’s office, the secretary’s team issued a memo on Aug. 27 instructing local clerks to effectively stop processing challenges filed by the COF.

In the directive, Deputy Secretary of Elections Mark Wlaschin arbitrarily claimed that Aguilar understood the “personal knowledge” requirement in the statute used by Muth’s group to make its challenges “to mean the same thing” as it does in a separate provision of state law. Wlaschin instructed local officials to “reject” challenges that did not comply with his office’s interpretation of the law, thus cutting off the CFO’s avenue for filing challenges to potentially unlawful registrants.

This prompted Muth and his group to file a lawsuit against the Carson City and Storey County clerks on Sept. 20. The suit alleged

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Politics

Here’s How The Media Are Lying Right Now: John Kelly And The New York Times Edition

Published

on

Everything about that highly promoted New York Times “interview” with former Trump White House Chief of Staff John Kelly — a general, if you haven’t heard! — reeked of fakery. But a piece of audio from the recorded phone conversations between Kelly and the Times reporter that wasn’t released until two days after the article proves just how artificial it truly was.

The original article was published on Tuesday and included a mix of audio snippets and text quotes of Kelly, presumably offering his answers to questions that the reporter, Michael Schmidt, was asking. At the very bottom was a sound clip labeled, “Kelly on the Importance of Character Over Policy.”

“I’m not recommending anything to anybody,” Kelly is heard telling Schmidt. “I’m just saying — other than, that when you’re looking to vote for someone, regardless, you’ve got to, you’ve got to look at the character and all those kinds of things and then start looking at the individual’s policies.” (Must be nice to live so comfortably that you can afford to vote first and foremost based on whether someone seems pleasant enough rather than how that person’s decisions would literally change your life and your loved ones’ lives.)

In Thursday’s edition of the Times’ “The Daily” podcast, however, there’s a more extended version of that recording that precedes Kelly’s remarks. In that version, Schmidt says something first. “Is there anything else that we need to talk about or is this enough?” he says to Kelly. “I think it’s plenty,” Kelly replies.

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Judge Tosses ‘Objectively Outrageous’ Charge Against Arizona Mom Arrested For Speaking At City Meeting

Published

on

On Wednesday, an Arizona judge dismissed the criminal case brought against a state resident who was arrested after criticizing her city government during a public meeting.

“The Defendant should not have faced criminal prosecution once for expressing her political views,” Justice of the Peace Gerald Williams wrote.

The entire saga began on Aug. 20, when resident Rebekah Massie spoke before the Surprise City Council during a public meeting. The Arizona mother was criticizing the conduct of the city attorney when she was abruptly cut off by Mayor Skip Hall, who accused her of “attacking” the city official “personally” and violating rules governing public meetings.

Massie claimed the rule was “unconstitutional” and that by limiting her testimony, the city was violating her First Amendment right to free speech. Following a short exchange of words, Hall called on a law enforcement official to have Massie removed from the meeting.

The Arizona mom was subsequently detained and charged with trespassing.

Writing on behalf of the Maricopa County Justice Courts, Williams dismissed the charge against Massie with prejudice, meaning the state cannot bring the case back to his court. The judge noted that “[n]o branch of any federal, state, or local government in this country should ever attempt to control the content of political speech,” and that, in Massie’s case, “the government did so in a manner that was objectively outrageous.”

“The Court agrees that she should never face criminal prosecution, for expressing her political views on that date at that time, again,” Williams wrote.

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

After Trying Every Other Trick in The Book, Democrats Go Full ‘Trump Is Hitler’ Days Before The Election

Published

on

They’ve attacked him. They’ve impeached him. They’ve arrested him. They’ve desperately tried to imprison him. They unconstitutionally denied him access to the ballot. They’ve tried to kill him. 

Democrats have failed at every turn to get rid of Donald Trump. 

Now the self-proclaimed defenders of democracy and their corporate media allies are turning to the last vestige of hope for the desperate in an extremely tight presidential race: Lies. 

And name-calling. 

‘Do You Think Donald Trump Is a Fascist?’

Democrat presidential hopeful Kamala Harris opened Wednesday night’s CNN town hall with a long tirade in which she warned ostensibly undecided voters that Trump would be a dictator if given another term in the Oval Office. 

“Do you think Donald Trump is a fascist?” host Anderson Cooper asked the vice president in the opening moments of the latest long-form, packaged-as-news political ad for the Harris-Walz campaign. 

“Yes, I do. Yes, I do,” Harris answered as if reciting an unholy wedding vow. 

Of course she does. The “Trump is Hitler” narrative is Harris’ — and the left’s — closing argument in a Reader’s Digest presidential campaign for the Democrats. It must be noted that Harris’ abridged quest began with the Democrats’ bloodless coup that removed the demented Democrat president of the United States from his run for a second term. 

In an act of corporate media collusion so transparent it burns the eyes, the shameless Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief at The Atlantic, published the hit piece earlier this week that Harris and her

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending