Connect with us

Politics

The Herschel Walker Abortion Accusation Changes Nothing

Published

on

Most voters wish they could cast a ballot for a witty, intellectually gifted, self-made person who is not only a relentless fighter for worthy causes but chaste in his personal life. This, of course, is seldom the choice. And when politicians pretend to be those things, it is galling to catch them in personal hypocrisy.

I have no idea if Herschel Walker is a good man or not. Now, it’s not like he drunkenly drove a woman off a bridge and then let her die in the murky waters off Martha’s Vineyard, but there are a number of alleged incidents that suggest he’s struggled in his personal life. The Daily Beast now reports that Walker, who has taken a pro-life position, paid for a woman’s abortion in 2009.

Being mildly autistic on these matters, I have never really cared much about a candidate’s personal life. At least, short of corruption or abuse or negligent homicide. Like my friends, I’d prefer that politicians be principled and virtuous and bright and emphatic, but the ideological decency of a candidate’s policies is far more important than all that. Without the slightest hesitation, I would support a sociopathic constitutionalist, prone to debauchery and lying, over a chaste family man who believes in a collectivist or authoritarian philosophy. The latter’s bad ideas have generational consequences. I don’t care if he takes his kids to soccer practice every day.  

Of course, most political choices aren’t as clearly binary as my theoretical match-up. And there are limits to everything. Character matters. Those who lie and cheat are also prone to corruption. And a dishonorable person you agree with can’t always be trusted to follow through on their political promises. The problem is that the honorable politician you don’t agree with can be.

In any event, I’m not sure why the Walker accusation should change anything in the Georgia race. (It’s not as if his opponent Raphael Warnock is a paragon of decency, anyway.) Walker denies paying for his girlfriend’s abortion. The evidence seems to strongly suggest the story is true — unless someone forged a check. But because the media have spent a decade trashing their reputation, people have a right to wonder.

If Walker did it, though, he could have just admitted it, anyway. There are scores of elected leaders who have allegedly “evolved” to the pro-abortion position. There is no shame in taking the better journey. If I’m a political consultant — and let’s concede here that I don’t think I could win an election in my own home — this is what I would have had Walker say:

Thirteen years ago, I paid for the abortion of a woman I was dating. I take full responsibility for those actions. Back then, I still believed abortion was nothing but a harmless medical procedure. I selfishly thought of nothing but my convenience. I believed that the tiny human life, with its own DNA and heartbeat and future, was nothing but a clump of cells that could be thrown away. This is what the culture, media, and politicians have been telling us for decades. I fell for it. I deeply regret my decision now. Because over the past decade, I have matured. My views have evolved on the issue. Every human life is worthwhile, and no matter how small, it deserves protection from violence.

While I can never change the past, if the voters of Georgia help elect me to the United States Senate, I will make it my mission to be a fierce champion of life in Washington. And the unborn need champions now more than ever. Democrats, like my opponent Raphael Warnock, want to force all of you — every single taxpayer in Georgia — to write checks for someone’s abortion. My opponent believes in legalized abortion on demand, for any reason, paid for by taxpayers, until the moment of birth. That amounts to hundreds of thousands of abortions every year. That equals about 10,000 viable babies terminated every year. In Georgia, 65 percent of all abortions end the life of an unborn black child — the second highest percentage in the entire country. Warnock wants the government to subsidize this attack on our communities. He wants to overturn existing Georgia law and create a federal regime that strips all limitations on abortion. And none of that is even to mention the hardship Warnock has inflicted on Georgians by supporting Biden’s inflation-inducing economic destruction.

So, while I can’t take back the past, and must live with my decisions, I can help forge a better future. I hope you’ll give me the chance.

It’s probably too late for this since the candidate has adamantly claimed The Daily Beast story is a lie and has threatened to sue. Indeed, conceding anything these days is considered cuckish behavior. I disagree. It takes fortitude to admit inadequacy or personal failing, and one imagines it’s more difficult to do so in public. If it’s true.


CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Calls Grow For Nebraska Republicans To Adopt Winner-Take-All System Before 2024 Election

Published

on

In a move that could help Donald Trump’s prospects of winning the White House, Nebraska’s GOP leadership is calling on state lawmakers to switch to a winner-take-all system for awarding Electoral College votes before Election Day.

On Wednesday, Republican Gov. Jim Pillen met with two dozen state senators and Secretary of State Bob Evnen at his official residence to encourage the GOP-controlled legislature to pass a law allocating the Cornhusker State’s five Electoral College votes to whichever presidential candidate receives the most votes statewide. South Carolina GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham also reportedly attended the meeting, according to the left-wing Nebraska Examiner.

Nebraska is one of two states (the other being Maine) that splits its Electoral College votes. As explained by the National Archives, these states “appoint individual electors based on the winner of the popular vote within each Congressional district and then 2 ‘at-large’ electors based on the winner of the overall state-wide popular vote.”

During the 2020 election, Joe Biden garnered a single electoral vote by winning Nebraska’s 2nd District. The reverse happened in Maine, where Trump won the state’s 2nd District and accompanying electoral vote.

As my colleague Brianna Lyman previously explained, the fate of which candidate wins the presidential election could hinge on who comes out on top in Nebraska’s 2nd District. If Kamala Harris “were to win Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin but lose Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona, for example, [she] could still reach 270 — so long as [she] received one of Nebraska’s electoral

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Amber Thurman Died From The Abortion Pill, Not Pro-Life Laws

Published

on

Democrats and their corporate media allies are so desperate to get rid of pro-life laws that they’ll fabricate stories to wrongly smear them as not only bad for women but deadly.

The latest is ProPublica’s story of a Georgia woman who died after a North Carolina abortionist gave her chemical abortion pills — which, contrary to Democrat narratives, are unsafe. The article, however, pretends the death was caused by Georgia’s pro-life laws. The author of the story repeatedly attempts to conflate a procedure used to treat miscarriages, dilation and curettage (D&C), with elective abortion.

In ProPublica’s telling, 28-year-old Amber Nicole Thurman had ingested the chemical abortion pill regimen, which consists of the drugs mifepristone and misoprostol. Mifepristone ends the life of the developing human being; misoprostol helps achieve complete expulsion of the embryo.

It’s worth noting that the FDA’s 2000 approval of mifepristone acknowledged its risks and enacted safety requirements, including a seven-week gestational limit, requiring women to see a physician in person, and a mandatory one-time post-abortion appointment to confirm that the uterus was empty and that bleeding had subsided. The FDA also required manufacturers of the abortion pill to report all adverse health events that were reported to them, such as infection or excessive bleeding — not just patient deaths. 

But thanks to Democrat efforts to relax safety requirements for abortion pills, important safeguards no longer apply. When Thurman experienced “complications” from the abortion, which ProPublica wrongly asserts are “rare,” she went to the hospital for a

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

Idaho Secretary of State Partners With Federal Censors In The Name Of ‘Election Security’

Published

on

Idaho Secretary of State Phil McGrane, a Republican, is partnering with the federal censorship office Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to talk about “election security.”

McGrane held a press conference on Wednesday with CISA director Jen Easterly in the Idaho state capital, after which the Idaho Republican said he was “grateful for the partnership” in a post on X.

CISA is America’s newest federal agency, established in 2018 in part to protect the American electrical grid and “critical infrastructure” from “cybersecurity threats.” In 2017, this included election infrastructure, which then-outgoing DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson designated as a “critical infrastructure subsector,” as noted in a 2023 federal report. The agency has also been working with Big Tech to silence Americans’ speech and put its thumb on the scale of elections.

The agency is behind the massive push to censor what state-power oligarchs deem to be “disinformation.” West Virginia Secretary of State Mac Warner told my colleague M.D. Kittle earlier this year that the “disinformation” narrative is a “psychological operation against the American people” that is “as bad as it gets.”

Nonetheless, McGrane seemed to heap praise on CISA.

“As Idaho’s Secretary of State, I am dedicated to protecting our elections and ensuring that every vote counts,” he reportedly said in a Sept. 16 press release. “The support we receive from CISA is invaluable, especially for our rural communities that often lack funding and resources when it comes to cybersecurity. Federal support and expertise help us provide consistent and robust security

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending